Cost-Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery in Patients Living with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.

Aims: The favourable effects of bariatric surgeries on body weight reduction and glucose control have been demonstrated in several studies. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgeries has been confirmed in several analyses. The aim of the current analysis was to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgeries in obese patients with type 2 diabetes in Hungary compared to conventional diabetes treatments based on economic modelling of published clinical trial results. Materials and Methods: Patients entered the simulation model at the age of 45 with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes. The model was performed from the public payer's perspective, comparing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures to conventional care of diabetes. The results were provided separately for three BMI categories. Results: The base-case analysis demonstrated that both surgery types were dominant; i.e., they saved 17 064 to 24 384 Euro public payer expenditures and resulted in improved health outcomes (1.36 to 1.50 quality-adjusted life years gain (QALY)) in the three BMI categories. Bariatric surgeries extended the life expectancy and the disease-free survival times of all the investigated diabetes complications. All the scenario analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case analysis, such that bariatric surgeries remained dominant compared to conventional diabetes treatments. Conclusion: The results of this cost-effectiveness analysis highlight the importance of bariatric surgeries as alternatives to conventional diabetes treatments in the obese population. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that a wider population has access to these surgeries in Hungary.

[From GLP1 receptor agonists to triple hormone receptor activation supplemented with glucagon receptor agonism.] / A GLP1-receptor-agonistáktól a glükagonreceptor-agonizmussal kiegészített hármashormonreceptor-aktiválásig.

Following the introduction of mono- and then dual hormone (incretin) receptor agonists into therapy, attention was turned to multiple receptor stimulation, with the additional activation of the glucagon receptor, as a new option for the pharmaceutical treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. In addition to its role in carbohydrate metabolism, the article reviews the other important physiological tasks of glucagon, especially its participation in intrainsular paracrine regulation, energy expenditure and the shaping of appetite and food consumption. It covers the potential benefits of the triple combination and briefly touches data on the efficacy and safety of the first triple receptor agonist drug, retatrutide, in preclinical human studies. Further confirmation of the promising results may represent progress in the treatment of these forms of disease and their accompanying conditions, such as steatosis hepatis. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(42): 1656-1664.

iGlarLixi (insulin glargine 100 U/ml plus lixisenatide) is effective and well tolerated in people with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes regardless of age: A REALI pooled analysis of prospective real-world data.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety in routine clinical practice of insulin glargine/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) according to age. METHODS: Patient-level data were pooled from 1316 adults with T2D inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs with or without basal insulin who initiated iGlarLixi for 24 weeks. Participants were classified into age subgroups of younger than 65 years (N = 806) and 65 years or older (N = 510). RESULTS: Compared with participants aged younger than 65 years, those aged 65 years or older had a numerically lower mean body mass index (31.6 vs. 32.6 kg/m2 ), a longer median diabetes duration (11.0 vs. 8.0 years), were more likely to receive prior basal insulin (48.4% vs. 43.5%) and had a lower mean HbA1c (8.93% [74.10 mmol/mol] vs. 9.22% [77.28 mmol/mol]). Similar and clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 24 of iGlarLixi therapy were observed regardless of age. At 24 weeks, least-squares adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change in HbA1c from baseline was -1.55% (-1.65% to -1.44%) in those aged 65 years or older and -1.42% (-1.50% to -1.33%) in those aged younger than 65 years (95% CI: -0.26% to 0.00%; P = .058 between subgroups). Low incidences of gastrointestinal adverse events and hypoglycaemic episodes were reported in both age subgroups. iGlarLixi decreased mean body weight from baseline to week 24 in both subgroups (-1.6 kg in those aged ≥ 65 years and -2.0 kg in those aged < 65 years). CONCLUSIONS: iGlarLixi is effective and well tolerated in both younger and older people with uncontrolled T2D.

[The "other" incretin - the therapeutic rediscovery of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide]. / A "másik" inkretin ­ a glükózdependens insulinotrop polipeptid terápiás újrafelfedezése.

Among the two incretins that strongly stimulate insulin secretion and are also involved in its physiological regulation in type 2 diabetes, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) has been the focus of interest for a long time, due to its retained - although reduced - secretagogue nature also in type 2 diabetes. Its receptor agonists were also included in the antidiabetic treatment toolkit. In the light of more recent studies, however, the "other" incretin, the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) has also come into a different light. It turned out that by regulating glucagon and insulin production according to blood sugar levels, it acts as a bifunctional blood sugar stabilizing factor in type 2 diabetes as well. The article reviews new data on the physiology of GIP, its verifiable effects in type 2 diabetes and obesity, the so-called "twincretin" effect as well as the benefits of the double stimulation of the GIP and the GLP1 receptor. It describes the pharmacology of the first dual receptor agonist, tirzepatide, already incorporated in therapeutic recommendations, and the first clinical trials related to its use. In the light of the data so far, the molecule may open new horizons in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(6): 210-218.

Effectiveness and Safety of iGlarLixi (Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL Plus Lixisenatide) in Type 2 Diabetes According to the Timing of Daily Administration: Data from the REALI Pooled Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: iGlarLixi (insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide) has demonstrated glycaemic efficacy and safety in adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Per the European Medicines Agency's product label, iGlarLixi should be injected once a day within 1 h prior to a meal, preferably the same meal every day when the most convenient meal has been chosen. It is however unknown whether iGlarLixi administration timing affects glycaemic control and safety, as clinical trial evidence is mainly based on pre-breakfast iGlarLixi administration. Therefore, we assessed the effectiveness and safety of iGlarLixi in clinical practice, according to its administration timing. METHODS: Data were pooled from two prospective observational studies including 1303 European participants with T2DM inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs with or without basal insulin who initiated iGlarLixi therapy for 24 weeks. Participants were classified into four subgroups based on daily timing of iGlarLixi injection: pre-breakfast (N = 436), pre-lunch (N = 262), pre-dinner (N = 399), and those who switched iGlarLixi injection time during the study (N = 206). RESULTS: No meaningful differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the study groups. Least-squares mean reductions in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 24 were substantial in all groups, with the numerically largest decrease observed in the pre-breakfast group (1.57%) compared with the pre-lunch (1.27%), pre-dinner (1.42%), or changed injection time (1.33%) groups. Pre-breakfast iGlarLixi injection also resulted in a numerically greater proportion of participants achieving HbA1c < 7.0% at week 24 (33.7% versus 19.0% for pre-lunch, 25.6% pre-dinner, and 23.2% changed injection time). iGlarLixi was well tolerated across all groups, with low rates of gastrointestinal disorders and hypoglycaemia. Mean body weight decreased similarly in all groups (by 1.3-2.3 kg). CONCLUSION: iGlarLixi was effective and safe regardless of its daily administration time. However, pre-breakfast iGlarLixi injection resulted in a more effective glycaemic control.

[Is there a need for a revised classification in diabetes mellitus?] / Indokolt-e a klasszifikáció módosítása diabetesben?

Diabetes mellitus is a cluster of diseases with heterogeneous etiopathogenesis and clinical nature. The exact classification of certain cases is of decisive importance in terms of the optimal choice of treatment. However, the classification is still not completely resolved, despite the available, ever-expanding tool park and rapidly expanding knowledge. Therefore, new recommendations are made to clarify the grouping. This article reviews the classification guidelines created between 1965 and 2019 based on international consensus, with the coordination of the World Health Organization (WHO), as well as the proposals made based on recent tests and observations. It states that for daily practice, the present WHO guideline is still the most orienting. In addition, in cases of uncertain classification, it is essential to follow up the patients and repeat the examinations as necessary, until the nature of the specific form of the disease is clarified. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(48): 1909-1916.

Effectiveness of IGlarLixi, a Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL and Lixisenatide, in People with Type 2 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: The latest Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes proposes the use of a fixed-ratio combination (FRC) of a long-acting basal insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist as part of treatment intensification. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the insulin glargine + lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) FRC on glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in real-life settings. METHODS: This non-interventional, 26-week study included participants aged 18-80 years with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) using oral antidiabetics (OADs) ± basal insulin therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who achieved at least a 1% decrease in glycated haemoblobin (HbA1c) level from baseline to week 26. RESULTS: Of the 441 participants eligible for entry into the study, 353 were included in the efficacy analyses. These individuals were switched from OADs without (282 [79.9%]) or with (71 [20.1%]) insulin-based treatment. A reduction in HbA1c of at least 1.0% (primary endpoint) was achieved by 215 subjects (60.9%). All glycaemic variables (mean ± standard deviation) improved significantly during follow-up (HbA1c, from 8.9 ± 1.31 to 7.4 ± 0.97%; fasting blood glucose, from 9.0 ± 2.18 to 6.9 ± 1.23 mmol/L; postprandial blood glucose, from 11.3 ± 2.33 to 8.5 ± 1.46 mmol/L; p < 0.001 for all). Body weight also decreased during follow-up, from 90.5 ± 18.03 to 88.2 ± 17.75 kg (p < 0.001). Overall, 41 participants (9.3% of the safety population) self-reported 101 non-severe hypoglycaemic episodes (incidence rate 0.498 events/person-year). There were no severe hypoglycaemic episodes reported. Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported by five participants (1.1% of the safety population). The vast majority (96.6%) of the study population continued iGlarLixi treatment after the final visit. CONCLUSION: The results of this non-interventional study confirmed the efficacy results of the randomized controlled trial programme of the iGlarLixi FRC in a real-life setting. iGlarLixi significantly improved glycaemic control in association with a low frequency of hypoglycaemia and gastrointestinal adverse events in a heterogeneous population of participants with T2D suboptimally controlled with OADs ± basal insulin.

Network analysis of neurotransmitter related human kinase genes: possible role of SRC, RAF1, PTK2B?

Previous co-expression analysis of human kinase genes highlighted 119 genes in neurotransmitter-related activity (based on Go:Terms). Using a merged interactome dataset, we analyzed the network of these Neurotransmitter Related Human Kinase Genes. Using the full interactome dataset we extended the network and calculating degrees and closeness centralities we identified SRC, MAPK1, RAF1, PTK2B and AKT1 kinase genes as potentially relevant nodes which did not show relevant activity in the original experimental study. As AKT1 and MAPK1 have already been indicated in various neuronal functions, we hypothesize a potential direct or indirect role for SRC, RAF1, PTK2B genes in neurotransmission and in central nervous system signaling processes.

Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus using a Novel Vaccine.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) affects 1 in 300 people and the incidence of the disease is rising worldwide. T1DM is caused by chronic autoimmune destruction of the insulin-producing ß-cells. The exact etiology and primary auto-antigen are not yet known. The autoimmune, chronic, and progressive nature of the disease raises the possibility of intervention, preferably by slowing down or stopping the destruction of the ß-cells as early as the prediabetic stage. Since the 1980s, several attempts have been made to maintain ß-cell function using immunosuppressive agents, immune modulation such as plasmapheresis, cytokine therapy, or antibody treatment. These agents were not diabetes specific; the occasionally observed beneficial effect did not compensate for the often very severe side effects. According to the latest assumption, the administration of diabetes-specific auto-antigens can elicit tolerance, which can prevent the destruction of the ß-cells, hopefully without serious side effects. The authors summarize current understanding of the immunology of T1DM, review the trials on prevention, and discuss their vaccination study.